首页 - 范文案例 > Essay代写范文-UK National Minimum Wage

Essay代写范文-UK National Minimum Wage

发布于:2020-12-03 作者:yaya 阅读:2982
导读: 本文是一篇essay代写范文,题目为UKNationalMinimumWage,本文主要讨论了英国国家最低工资水平。全国最低工资(NMW)介绍了在英国19...

本文是一篇essay代写范文,题目为UK National Minimum Wage,本文主要讨论了英国国家最低工资水平。全国最低工资(NMW)介绍了在英国1999年的目标,帮助许多低收入工人尽可能无任何重大不良影响通胀或就业。这篇文章将探讨最低工资应高于目前的水平£5.80市场竞争作为一种工具使用供求结构。对英国经济的最低工资的影响将进行调查,并与1999年的最低工资在原来的目标相比。

timg (12).jpg

The UK National Minimum Wage is currently set at less than 50 per cent of median earnings. Should it be set higher?

英国全国最低工资标准目前不到平均工资的50%。它应该设置更高吗?

The National Minimum Wage (NMW) was introduced in the UK in 1999, with the goal of helping “as many low-paid workers as possible without any significant adverse impacts on inflation or employment” (Low Pay Commission, 2006) This essay will explore whether the minimum wage should be higher than its current level of £5.80 using the demand-supply framework in a competitive market as a tool. The impact of the minimum wage on the UK economy will be investigated, and compared against the original goals of the minimum wage back in 1999.

英国于1999年推出了国家最低工资(NMW),目的是帮助“尽可能多的低收入工人,而不会对通货膨胀或就业造成任何重大不利影响”(低工资委员会,2006年)本文将以竞争市场中的供需框架为工具,探讨最低工资是否应高于目前的5.80英镑水平。我们将调查最低工资对英国经济的影响,并与1999年最低工资的最初目标进行比较。

The central argument for a NMW is that it protects low paid workers from exploitation. It is “rooted in concern about the ability of markets to provide income equity for the least able members of the work force” (Eatwell et all, 1987). Whilst there is general consensus that socially and morally the NMW is a good thing, the economic benefits versus drawbacks have been vigorously debated for years. The principle argument against is that setting a NMW above the equilibrium point of the demand and supply curves (essential for a NMW to be effective) in a competitive market will cause unemployment through an increase in the supply of labour (because workers are incentivised by higher wages) and decrease in the demand for labour (because firms cannot afford to pay for the same volume of labour as before). One crucial point is that the equilibrium point (and the corresponding supply and demand curves) relates to each worker, and their employability, and therefore there is no one equilibrium point that holds for the market.

NMW的核心论点是它保护低收入工人免受剥削。它“根植于对市场能力为劳动力中能力最弱的成员提供收入公平的能力的担忧”(Eatwell等人,1987年)。虽然人们普遍认为NMW在社会和道德上是一件好事,但经济利益与缺点之间的争论已持续多年。反对的主要论点是,在竞争性市场中,将非关税壁垒设置在需求和供给曲线的平衡点之上(这对非关税壁垒的有效性至关重要)将通过增加劳动力供应(因为工人受到更高工资的激励)和劳动力需求的减少(因为企业无法支付与以前相同数量的劳动力)。一个关键点是,均衡点(以及相应的供求曲线)与每个工人及其就业能力有关,因此市场没有一个平衡点。

There is no one accepted definition of what low pay is, or indeed what the level of the minimum wage should be. At the upper limit, the Council of Europe defines a so called ‘decency threshold' that originally was 2/3 of the mean wage level (Council of Europe, 2008). This has now been revised down to 60% of net earnings. This would give a NMW in the UK of between £8.17 and £9.00 (40-55% higher than the current £5.80 level). As a result of this up to 38% of full-time workers would have their wages improved (Sloman and Hinde). If the NMW was set at 2/3 of median male earnings rather than mean wages, this would lead to a NMW of £7.50, and positively impact 20% of men and 40% of women. (Sloman and Hinde, 2007)

Regardless of which measure is chosen to compare the NMW to average (mean, median, full-time male etc), it is clear that the UK NMW is someway off the 60-67% of ‘average' earnings suggested as appropriate. On the flipside, the Low Pay Commission has recommended (and had accepted) above average earnings rises in the minimum wage over the past 10 years (Low Pay Commission, 2009).

A minimum wage acts as a “classical price floor on labour” (Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994). It goes on to explain that “if set above the equilibrium price, more labor will be willing to be provided by workers than will be demanded by employers” The result is “a surplus of the commodity” and this “takes the form of unemployment, which tends to be higher with minimum wage laws than without them” (Sowell, 2007).

It is clear from the above diagram that in a competitive market, setting a minimum wage above the equilibrium rate, leads to deadweight welfare loss. The consumer (employer) surplus must decrease, while producer (employee) surplus may or may not increase; however the decrease in consumer surplus must be greater than the increase in producer surplus

Back in 1946, Stigler argued (Stigler, 1946) that “a rise in the minimum wage leads perfectly competitive employers to cut employment”. The level of the NMW is not the sole factor determining the size of this employment gap. The elasticity of price for a sectors goods has an impact as well (Sloman and Hinde). Since the NMW applies to the sector as a whole, and not an individual firm, this elasticity effect is attenuated, and the potential unemployment in any one firm minimized. Additional complications such as replacing staff with machines, or overseas threats, serve to ensure that the NMW has the potential to cause unemployment in some sectors prone to these 2 cost reduction techniques.

Under monopsonistic competition, in which the employer has “some influence over rates of pay (Sloman and Hinde), an “appropriately set minimum wage could increase both wages and employment, with the optimal level being equal to the marginal productivity of labor” (Manning, 2003). In this sense, the NMW is seen from the perspective of being a “market regulation policy akin to antitrust policies, as opposed to an illusory "free lunch" for low wage workers” (Manning, 2003) . Dickens et al (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) propose that a modern monopsonistic framework, less based on unrealistic company town concepts, and more on “labor market frictions” could explain the (neoclassically) anomalous neutral/positive employment impacts caused by the introduction of a NMW. They studied the ‘Wage Councils' in the UK, the forerunner to the UK NMW, and found that such firms potentially have a “degree of monopsony power” (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) because those that cut wages “do not instantaneously lose all their workers, so the supply of labor to a firm is not perfectly elastic”. They found that “irrespective of specification and data definition, the effect of minimum wages on employment is always estimated to be nonnegative and in many cases to be positive”. They do add a word of caution, however, that if the NMW was set “high enough”, their theoretical framework could lead to negative results.

Blinder (Blinder, 1996) argues that an increased NMW encourages employees to stay, thus reducing turnover and training costs (associated with new employees). It could also “render moot” (Blinder, 1996) the potential problem of recruiting workers at a higher wage than current workers. He further argues that minimum workers may be such a small part of a businesses cost that it doesn't matter. Whilst these are not proven points, they could explain part of the reason why the NMW has not had a negative impact on the UK economy as a whole.

Contrary to initial concern, and possibly as a result of the deliberately cautious (Low Pay Commission, 2009) initial £3.60 rate; there has been little evidence that the NMW has had a negative economic impact. Research by the Low Pay Commission has found that employers may have “reduced their rate of hiring, reduced staff hours, increased prices, and have found ways to cause current workers to be more productive (especially service companies)” (Low Pay Commission, 2005)

Research in the US by Card and Krueger (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) showed that increases in the minimum wage actually increased employment. This result was supported by Krugman (Krugman, 2007) and Stiglitz (Stiglitz, 2002), but vehemently opposed by Murphy, Mankiv (Mankiw, 1999) and Becker (Becker, 1995).

In the UK, Machin et al (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) demonstrated that the “current evidence on the employment effects of the National Minimum Wage suggests that these effects (employment and hours reduction) have been small or non-existent, whilst Stewart (Stewart, 2004) showed “there to have been no reduction in the employment probabilities of minimum wage workers as compared to workers slightly higher up the wage distribution”.

The Low Pay Commission in their 2009 commission report (Low Pay Commission, 2009) assert that the NMW continues to exert “significant influence on wages at the bottom of the earnings distribution” whilst “firms appear to have adapted to these increases in wage costs by changing pay structures, removing wage premia, and reducing non-wage costs” This would suggest that the NMW is achieving its goals of benefiting low paid workers, whilst having a “benign influence on the economy” (Low Pay Commission, 2009)

The efficiency hypothesis states that “the productivity of workers rise as the wage rates rise” (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Therefore the introduction of a NMW should improve workers, and firms, productivity. However, however empirical studies in the UK (Low Pay Commission, 2009) have found no evidence for this to be true.

Draca et al (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) showed that wage increases were not passed onto consumers as price increases, and therefore profitability was “significantly” affected by the introduction of the NMW in the UK. They also observed, however, that few firms had gone out of business, and suggested that the effect of the NMW was to ‘moderate these excess profits by channeling them back to the wages of low paid workers'(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005)

Since the introduction of the minimum wage in the UK in 1999, the level has risen against median earnings year on year. The low pay commission has sought to exhibit a “cautious approach” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) during times of uncertainty, whilst increasing it faster than the average wage during economically stable periods, and thus improving the “effective level of the minimum wage” (Low Pay Commission, 2009). Studies on the impact of the NMW, both in the UK (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) (Stewart, 2004), and the US (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) have shown neutral to positive employment probability impacts of the NMW, negligible consumer product prices rises with a reduction in firm profitability (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005). At the same time, a significant number of workers have benefitted (Low Pay Commission, 2009) (Dickens and Manning, 2004). However, this picture must be considered against the backdrop of a buoyant economy and increasing labour market flexibility between 1999 and 2007 (Sloman and Hinde). Since 2007 there has been “relative economic uncertainty” (Low Pay Commission, 2009), and the Low Pay Commission has recommended a more “modest increase” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) this year of 7 pence taking the adult NMW to £5.80. In light of the data showing a year on year fall in aggregate employment in 2008 (Low Pay Commission, 2009), combined with studies showing that whilst small rises in NMW appear to have a relatively benign economic impact (Stewart, 2004), increasing the NMW outside its “range of indeterminacy (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) to the levels suggested by the Council of Europe (Council of Europe, 2008) , may well lead to the negative employment and inflation impacts predicted in the literature (Mankiw, 1999) (Becker, 1995). An increase in the NMW is, therefore, currently not recommended.

References 参考文献

(Becker, 1995) Becker "IT'S SIMPLE: HIKE THE MINIMUM WAGE, AND YOU PUT PEOPLE OUT OF WORK BusinessWeek.

(Blinder, 1996) Alan S. Blinder, "The $5.15 Question," The New York Times, 23 May 1996, p. A29.

(Card and Krueger, 1994) David Card and Alan B. Krueger, "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the FastFood Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania," American Economic Review, Volume 84, no. 4 (September 1994), pp. 774775.

(Card and Krueger, 1995) Card, D. and Krueger, A. 1995 Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

(Council of Europe, 2008) Council of Europe, DIGEST OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS, 1st Sept 2008

(Dickens and Manning, 2004) Dickens, R. and A. Manning (2004) "Spikes and Spill-overs: The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on the Wage Distribution in a Low-Wage Sector", Economic Journal. Vol. 114, No. 49.

(Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) Dickens, Richard, Stephen Machin and Alan Manning (1999): "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain", Journal of Labor Economics, 17(1), 1-22.

(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) Draca, Mirko, Stephen Machin and John Van Reenen (2005): "The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on Profits and Prices: Report for Low Pay Commission", February.

(Eatwell et all, 1987) Eatwell, John, Ed.; Murray Milgate, Peter Newman (1987). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press Limited. pp. 476-478. ISBN 0333372352

(Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994) Ehrenberg, R. and Smith, R. "Modern labor economics: theory and public policy", HarperCollins, 1994, 5th ed.

(Krugman, 2007) Paul Krugman, The conscience of a liberal (W.W. Norton & Co., 2007)

(Low Pay Commission, 2005) Low Pay Commission (2005). National Minimum Wage Low Pay Commission Report 2005

(Low Pay Commission, 2006) - From Low Pay Commission

(Low Pay Commission, 2009) National Minimum Wage - Low Pay Commission Report 2009

(Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) Stephen Machin; Alan Manning; Lupin Rahman, "Where the Minimum Wage Bites Hard: Introduction of Minimum Wages to a Low Wage Sector "Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Mar., 2003), pp. 154-180

(Mankiw, 1999) Mankiw

(Manning, 2003) Manning, Alan (2003). Monopsony in motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691113122

(Mason, 2009) Adapted from Robin Masons BEMM734 Lecture notes

(Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Sloman, John and Kevin Hinde, Economics for Business, ISBN 0273709089. p382-384

(Sowell, 2007) Sowell, Thomas (20070402). Basic Economics (3rd Edition): A Common Sense Guide to the Economy

(Stewart, 2004) Stewart, Mark (2004) 'The Impact of the Introduction of the UK Minimum Wage on the Employment Probabilities of Low Wage Workers', Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 67-97.

(Stigler, 1946) Stigler, G. 1946. The economics of minimum wage legislation. American Economic Review 36: 358-365.

(Stiglitz, 2002) Joseph Stiglitz. Employment, social justice and societal wellbeing , International Labour Review, 141 (12), p. 929.

以上就是Essay代写范文全部内容,欢迎阅读,范文内容和格式仅供留学生参考学习,不得抄袭,如有Essay代写需要,请联系网站客服。

二维码

扫一扫关注我们

版权声明:本站文章来源为原创以及网络整理,意在为留学生分享各种留学论文写作技巧以能够顺利完成学业,论文写作格式以及范文仅供学习参考。如本站文章和转稿涉及版权等问题,请及时联系本站,我站将在第一时间予以删除。

相关文章

  • 留学英国,如何避免Essay代写被发现?

    留学英国,如何避免Essay代写被发现?

    代写essay在国内是非常火爆的一项业务,有很多大学毕业生的essay都会找人代写,在国外也不例外,现在很多留学生也需要英国essay代写。不过英国代写会被发现...

    2021-11-30

  • 如何降低留学生作业辅导成本?

    如何降低留学生作业辅导成本?

    大部分的家庭送孩子去接受高等教育,特别是选择海外留学的形式,一方面是因为海外教育的质量比较好,不少的学生可以通过海外留学的形式直接落户当地,拿到海外绿卡,另外一...

    2021-11-24

  • 什么样的学生更需要找英国Essay代写?

    什么样的学生更需要找英国Essay代写?

    随着英国留学条件的放宽,以及人们生活水平、经济实力的提高,到英国求学的人数正在逐年增加,这也直接导致了英国留学生之间的竞争压力增加,英国的学校对留学生平时作业的...

    2021-11-23

  • Essay代写要点的详细讲解

    Essay代写要点的详细讲解

    广大留学生们想要把英文Essay写好,最基本也是最重要的方法就是去多多的练习Essay写作,Essay的写作并没有留学生们想象的那么难,如果留学生们能把最为基本...

    2021-11-19

  • 留学生作业辅导有什么用?

    留学生作业辅导有什么用?

    在国外上大学会遇到很多难以解决的难题,比如说语言和习俗方面,当课上老师全程用英语表述课本知识,并且语速过快时,对于这些到国外留学的学生真的很艰难,留学生作业辅导...

    2021-11-15

  • 为何留学生愿意顶着风险找代写?

    为何留学生愿意顶着风险找代写?

    代写领域的衍化是留学生剧增的一个现象,留学生作业代写在较为受欢迎的留学国家也是十分时兴的一种“缓解压力”方式,当留学生由于一些缘故自身不可以进行工作的情况下便会...

    2021-11-05

发表评论

X微信二维码

截屏,微信识别二维码

微信号:hotessay1

(点击微信号复制,添加好友)

微信号已复制,请打开微信添加好友!